Saturday, June 16, 2007

TOP TEN questions to everyone

Another top 10 from a parent:

非常感谢这个BLOG的主人给大家一个畅所欲言的地方. 希望今后能保留这个BLOG, 能让西北中文学校的家长和老师们能有了一个交流信息, 献计献策的地方.”
I too really appreciate BLOG的主人给大家一个畅所欲言的地方. It has attracted a lot of readers and contributors who posted many constructive ideas, suggestions as well as valid questions and comments for the most part. As BLOG 主人 stated, “We know everyone is caring our children's future, caring our community and like to make this great Chinese school a better place.” IT seems to me that there are still plenty of valid concerns and questions raised by the parents and teachers in this blog that remained unanswered. Yes, we all want to put the saga behind and move on and build a better and brighter future for NWCS and its community it served. But to do so, we all need to fully aware of and understand what and why went wrong in the past. 增加监督和透明性. Based on my reading of comments posted in this blog so far, here is the list of top ten questions we will like to hear answer from the Board and the top ten action items the board should put on its agenda now. Some of them are direct quotes from earlier post comments by others;
TOP TEN questions, in no particular order:
1. What is the most important factor the board considered in making its new principal hiring decision?
2. What issue(s) the board has identified regarding the school payroll and other expenses based on the recent review and audit conducted by the board and outside auditor. And what action the board plan to take to address the issues. “学校的帐户不清(参考5月7日周琳转发的电子邮件)到底是怎么回事? 我们所有家长和老师要求董事会给我们公开学校账务。
3. What are the PTA fund raising expenses consist of?
4. On what basis did past board handed out HUGH bonus to the principal ZL? “ZhouLin said board acknowledged her work and performance level and gave her bonuses for the first 3 semesters (1.5 years?). If so, what is board expected principal to do (the roles and responsibility), and how is the work of principal measured (balanced budget, reduce tuition, higher parents satisfaction, enrollment number, test passing rate, teacher/student ratio, etc.) What were the factors that board considered to give out bonuses to Zhou Lin?”
5. Did School strictly following not for profit related governing laws and regulations in terms of financial and tax reporting to the federal and state government? i.e. has the registration with the State of Washington been timely renewed yet? Payroll and information tax returns properly and timely filed and can face possible examination and inquiry by the watchdog agencies?
6. Why there are huge cash surplus sitting on the bank in the first place? “Why didn't these money spend on the education of our children? Just because we parents want our children learn Chinese and the culture, so we'd have to pay higher tuition such that they can save these money for God know what for?"
7. Has the past election of board members followed the School Bylaw and met the quantum requirement?
8. Did school admin and board follow the finance guidance to avoid conflict of interest and personal benefit, when dealing with outside venders and suppliers, did reimbursement policy properly followed? “I wonder whether we have some kind of internal control in place so that abuse of power would be prevented. for example, do we have dual signature in place for NWCS checks? or do we have a Finance Committee on the Board that will oversee the financial management of NWCS? do we have someone from the Board/Finance Committee review bank reconciliations?”
9. Why was the School directory consisting of complete list of admin member and teachers taken out of the NWCS webpage?
10. Who is the OWNER of NWCS?

To be continued

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good questions. I doult that the board have answers to, or even thought about most of them. They need help for sure.

Anonymous said...

非常同意。强烈要求董事会彻查学校帐目并公之于众。如若发现有违法行为,必须追究相关人员法律责任,绝不沽息。

Anonymous said...

是,没错。就放假了,就算查处了有错,家长董事还有机会开会吗?

面试两个参选人怎么会需要那么长的时间?还要"work day and night" 至于吗?

Anonymous said...

“Make the final determination on principal selection as soon as possible. This is of course the top priority. And publish the survey result of 6/9/2007 public hearing, with explanation of what criterion the board used to distinguish the final two candidates. Board can add comments and notes on how they see and interpret survey results. ”

说的非常好,董事会至少先把这些事情搞搞清楚,讲个明白。除了Nancy的那个留言,董事会一点实际性的东西也没有给过我们。查帐查出了问题不能对大家说,选出校长也不能公布,怎么搞得像是在做地下工作。

Anonymous said...

讲得真太好了。把我正要写出来的东西抢先一步发表了。

阿乡

Anonymous said...

我感觉中文学校的帐目可能有不符合规定或财务制度的问题,但是真正涉及到有意犯法的可能性应该没有.一共就那么点儿交易量,充其量不过四,五个HI-TECH企业全职雇员的年薪总和,不至于有多大油水.

今后的工作主要应该是在职业人员的监督和操作下保证制度完善.至于以前的问题,董事会应该尽快给出一个清单,向全体家长解释清楚.

另外现在的学生家长倒底算不算学校拥有者呢?如果是,以前的交学费的家长算不算呢?要知道大部分资产可是积累来的.如果真有一天清算,恐怕所有资产都会被要求交给州政府处理.不可能由全体现任学生家长投票决定.

Anonymous said...

我认为中文学校最重要的议题实际上是产权问题,而从逻辑上讲应该属于华州政府.

所以:

1,任何人无权要求学校将所有秘密数据公布于众,很可笑,一个事业单位的运营数据被要求公布给所有大众.

2.在拥护将现任校长劝退的同时,类似象向州政府教育司写信这种事并非上策,相当于"饮鸩止渴".我相信现在州政府相关经济部门已经关注这个学校了,并非谁当校长的问题,而是资产问题.要知道,政府工作人员如果能将这几十万资产纳入政府预算资金或税收范畴,个人是会得不少奖金的.

3.LWTC尽管不愿意失去中文学校这一长期合作伙伴,但是可能会受到州政府的压力.

4.如果学校自身的力量和能力解决不好问题,州政府可能组织社会上的无关人士,成立董事会介入.

当务之急是我们应该表面上淡化前一阶段的争斗,关起门来好好解决自己的问题.至于具体办法,已经有很多好的建议.

Anonymous said...

关于周琳这学期的奖金问题, 请董事会一定要按着法律办事, 并将董事会的决定公布给全体家长.

下面是L Chen 关于这个问题的原文:

第三种叫Excess Benefit,是指在里面的人员尤其是和决策层有关的人员,其得益大于其为该机构做出的贡献。I.R.C. Code Sec. 4958详细规定了对501(c)(3)和501(c)(4)里面DQs的惩罚。假如一个人应该拿$10000却拿了$20000,那么,不仅征收其多拿的25%的惩罚税,即$2500,并且必须把多拿的$10000加利息退还。如果到时没有退还,则加收200%的惩罚税,即$20000。在501(c)(3)和501(c)(4)里面,凡是不合理的薪水都可能犯这一罪状。什么是合理?其它类似机构对同样的位置付多少薪水,正是判断该DQs的薪水是否合理的标准之一。不仅如此,该条款还要直接追究批准者的责任并罚款10%,即$1000。所以,如果校长的薪水不合理,即使是董事会批准的也不行,因为董事会也不能损害全社会的利益。注意,现在的董事会成员们,你们如果续签校长的合同,尤其是在已经知道其他学校的薪水情况以后(见Qi Wang和Wo先生的Email),你们就得承担自己的法律责任,你们的责任保险恐怕也保护不了你们。我这儿可绝对不是吓唬谁威胁谁,不信,自己去网上查Internal Revenue Code: Sec. 4958,Taxes on excess benefit transactions。

Anonymous said...

华夏中文学校博根分校查帐风波上法庭

多维社记者吕贤修报导/徐小兵律师对多维社指出:华夏中文学校博根分校查帐风波上法庭这个事件,可提醒许多其它华人社团,要知法守法。尤其是非营利组织的帐目,要保持透明。

华夏中文学校新泽西博根分校,近日因年度查帐工作,家长理事会会长以“华夏中文学校”名义,将博根分校校长告上法庭。对於此案,原告表示,自己代表全体家长,此举也是给自己一个交代。至於被告,除怀疑对方的代表性,也相信事实会还自己清白。目前,被告已同意交出完整帐目,博根郡高等法院6月28日将为此再度开庭。事件进展,多维将持续追踪。

详细见链接:
http://www5.chinesenewsnet.com/gb/MainNews/Forums/BackStage/2007_6_17_22_42_5_215.html

Anonymous said...

他山之石,可以攻玉。报导的新泽西这所中文学校,和西北中文学校发生的情况有着惊人的相似性,都是校长不交账目1财经运作不透明,而且还干涉董事会的选举。不同的是,他们的董事会已经把校长告上法庭。BLOG主人可以看看能否把那条新闻登在主页,也好引以为戒。谢谢。