Monday, June 11, 2007

关于孙本经在六月九日听证会的结束语的评论

Anonymous said...
to quote L. Chen, as a public figure at NWCS Sun Benjing should be cautious about what he says at the Open Hearing. When he accused those parents of wrong doing, he was not speaking in the capacity of a Board Member. it was only his own personal opinion.


Anonymous said...
All taxpayers has the indisputable right to put forward inquiries to taxpayer funded non-profit organization, including on its staffs misconduct happened anywhere regardless. Sun BenJing's condemanation representing the board to taxpayer's basic right is flatly wrong! His on 6.9 already generated discontents among parents. He has damaged his and board's reputation

Let's demand Sun BenJing to explain.

Also, Sun representing the board condenmed annoymous mails. USA's First Amendment specially protect anonymous email. Sun is flatly wrong on this too!. Do we deserve some explanation from the board and Sun himself? You bet.

It is the time the board and all the NWCS need to be honest to itself and to the public. No more hiding and no more lying.


Anonymous said...
I support the letter to LWTC. Logically, any tax payer should not tolerate public school (LWTC) staff having morality issues.

Sending letter to LWTC is a the right thing to do.




Anonymous said...
The board's stand is that if anyone sends the letter outside of NWCS, it is showing our dirty laundry.




Anonymous said...
Then wash it. Unfortunately, the board, under those sold-out members, failed to clear our dirty laundry.

Sun Ben Jing is one of the soul sold-out guy.


Anonymous said...
" support the letter to LWTC. Logically, any tax payer should not tolerate public school (LWTC) staff having morality issues.

Sending letter to LWTC is a the right thing to do.

Totally agree. Zhoulin had done enough for prove who she is. Any responsible tax payer could done it. I wish that I was the one.

Anonymous said...
"(白:孙本经昨天大可不必那么激动,我丝毫看不出此事对中文学校有什么损害)"

33 comments:

Anonymous said...

就是啊,孙本经是不是表现得有点过头了呢?!

中文学校的董事会是不是就可以不遵美国宪法法?!

他到底代表的是自己还是董事会?如果代表董事会,这样的董事会还代表中文学校的民意吗?!

他有没有想过首先董事会对学校出了周琳这样的事件应该负什么样的责任?!

如果当时董事会及时解决周琳的问题根本不会造成如今中文学校的分裂,也不会有匿名信发到LWTC才能解决问题的结局。

虽然周琳不可能当校长了,大快人心。可是这样得到的结果对于中文学校其实是个羞辱。

Anonymous said...

有这么一段话:“得到这个职位后,我还向家人和一些朋友表达了自己的这些想法。我特别约定,如果有一天自己偏离了方向,在工作上起了私心,只顾这个校长的名利,而忘记了原来的理想,他们一定要第一个警告我。”

你们知道是谁说的并贴在网上的吗?对了,就是这位臭名昭著的女人。真真是虚伪到了何等的程度!当面好话说尽,背后坏事做绝!

Anonymous said...

上边这位家长说得好,孙本经就是个伪君子。他女儿只是一个高中生, 根本没受过美术专业训练, 就通过周琳的关系来中文学校教画画, 这简直是误人子弟。按照中文学校的规定, 任何老师的亲属是不能竟选董事会, (有利益冲突), 可他硬是厚着脸皮, 想方设法钻进了董事会。一面高喊着什么基督徒啊, 什么为中文学校好啊, 一面护着周琳坑害中文学校。在周六听证会上竟然义愤填膺地教训起全体老师和家长来了。本来大家还不知道最后一封匿名信竟将周琳她告到了LWTC 和洲教育部门, 经孙本经那么一激动, 却搞得人人皆知, 真不知道他是在帮周琳, 还是在害周琳。

我们全体家长要擦亮眼睛,不能让中文学校再成为象孙本经这样披着羊皮的豺狼的御用工具。他要是胆敢有一点不公正的行为, 我们就要罢免他的董事会的资格。让他的阴谋永远不能得逞。

Anonymous said...

各位先别这么说孙本经先生。孙本经、孙本经,老孙有本难念的经。呵呵,我觉得他不是那种一味袒护周林的人。也许收到LWTC和州政府的信把他吓傻了。大家别骂他。

Anonymous said...

而且,做过错事,或者不恰当的事,认识了,就好。比如胡晓君女士,现在也不再一味为周琳辩护了。能分期是非了,这就应该予以鼓励。只是周琳自己顽固不化,真是令人心寒。

Anonymous said...

孙本京此人的做人原则是没有原则。你好我好他也好。遇事不像,只会调和。自觉的怪不错的。其实挺让人恶心的。

Anonymous said...

What a biased blog. "Concerned Parent," ha... just like the "concerned parents" who sent the letter to the LWTC dean.

NWCS parents DWNWSeattle@gmail.com said...

I disagree and believe the rest of the viewers disagree with you as well. Although I own and moderate this blog, providing the openness view and opinions related to NWCS is the sole purpose of this blog and we all have seen the results. We welcome all opinions and including yours.

I sincerely thanks for all the contributors for providing many inside information as well as warm, constructive suggestion. This blog will stay as long as it can to provide another way of NWCS's governance.

Anonymous said...

“孙本京此人的做人原则是没有原则。你好我好他也好。遇事不想,只会调和。自觉的怪不错的。其实挺让人恶心的。”

只会调和的董事,和稀泥的,白白占一个董事的位子。

如果董事都像孙某,就糟了。

Anonymous said...

I would protect Zhou Lin if I were Sun Ben Jing. I would be in-moral to not help Zhou who granted my daughter (a high school student) a chance to work as a formal payroll teacher in NWCS.

Do not blame me, please. I am just human.

Anonymous said...

一个人招恨招到如此的程度也是绝无仅有了。这么多人想把她置于死地而后快。像《东方快车的谋杀案》。

她到底做了些什么如此招恨?她有什么值得称赞的地方吗?人总是有优点和缺点的。我相信她一定有长处。

Anonymous said...

She probably is good at taking care of family, love husband, good at LWTC work. A good Chinese teacher. Good driver (I don't know whether she has been ticketed), Good cook, she is an excellent PR person, good people skill. ... for all I know.

Anonymous said...

She probably is good at taking care of family, love husband, good at LWTC work. A good Chinese teacher. Good driver (I don't know whether she has been ticketed), Good cook, she is an excellent PR person, good people skill. ... for all I know.

Anonymous said...

But, a "chronical lair" who deadly need immidiate medical attention.

Anonymous said...

See these comments posted by her supporters, this is the indicator of something...

Why can say all those guys who committed crime in ENRON's scandal are bad apples in their life? They may have better personality even than average. But they are criminals!

We are talking about the most appropriate principal of the School, she is not, I suggest we stop arguing about this gal. She has been out of the picture. This is the FACT.


We are talking about the most appropriate principal of the School, she is not, I suggest we stop arguing about this gal. She has been out of the picture. This is the FACT.

Anonymous said...

我觉得周琳为中文学校是做了一些事,三万多块美金,加上报销和那麽多风光。 她能不做一点事吗。肯定是做了不少事,否则不是等于到中文学校盗窃来了。

关键是近两个月刘敬号梁录平李鸣岐之流的把她害了。胡志华是直接害她的。“老妈”的话在理。你们说哪?

不知道胡志华想再怎么想?

Anonymous said...

周琳已经走了,希望大家不要扩大战火。难道你们想把中文学校搞垮吗?!夜路走多了总会碰上鬼,难道你永远不会犯错?别老揪别人的辫子不放。李和梁也是家长,和你一样他们可以有自己的观念,和独立思考的权利。

现在大家的精力应该放在如何保证这样的事情不再发生上。

Anonymous said...

agree with what you said. let's look forward and concentrate on building a better NWCS. we should make constructive suggetstions for the Board here.

Anonymous said...

sorry, 我是说刘和梁,不是李和梁。

Anonymous said...

I 100% agree. Please don't use this blog to attack other people's reputation (anonymously). Let's unite, all the parents, no matter you are for ZL or against her. Even ZL, if she wants to back to do some good things as a volunteer, she should be welcomed.

To my knowledge, all former principals left because a conflict with board and never come back. Some become our competitors. Can we guaranttee the same thing would not happen for the next principal? Does our system is good enough to prevent this?

Now, more parents are involved or have lots of opinion in school's management. Do we have a system to resolve all conflicts diplomatically and democratically?

Peace to all of you.

Anonymous said...

Totally agree. Zhou Lin is a good Chinese teach. The school should hire her back.

Let it go. Continue hatres is not what we come here for.

Anonymous said...

a suggestion to the Board.

a lot of companies sign contracts that include a non-competitive clause when they hire employees for key positions. NWCS should do that, too. it should restrict the time period & georgraphic areas when/where NWCS principals can compete.

Anonymous said...

I think one of reasons people wrote some angry words on this blog is generally people DO NOT TRUST our current BOD or at least DO NOT HAVE CONFIDENCE that BOD will make a right decision regarding choosing next principal. Especially it seems that there are group parents with some "privileged" rights about govening NWCS. I don't want speculate their motivations and I am sure they have their own reasons even though they do not really reveal them in the public.

Since BOD is still deciding. Let's give them some time (how about by this coming Sat.?) to see what BOD will conclude about all this. Meanwhile we should focus on demanding BOD publicize survey results done on last Sat. and publicize detailed financial statement Zhou Lin promised (by May 25).

I think it is a TEST to our current BOD members.

Anonymous said...

"concerned parent,"

I have access to these anonymous, board and admin email just like you do and you are not posting half of it. Including the anonymous email sent yesterday from some "mom of nwcs."

btw, I'm not a Zhou Lin supporter. I just think sending out profanity anonymous emails attacking certain people is just the lowest of the low.

L Chen deserves a taste of his own medicine when his Microsoft supervisor also receives an anonymous letter dictating his inappropriate behavior of sending out insulting emails during working hours.

Anonymous said...

By the way, how did you know who L Chen is? How did you know about he works for Microsoft part?

Anonymous said...

Friends of admins have tracked down the anonymous letters are from an Microsof IP address

Anonymous said...

Oh, someone in admin is trying to track down the person who sent the fatal email to LWTC. Let me tell you, I almost did it in mid May, as I was frustrating about the case. I happened to have a LWTC catalog and have a lot of contact info in it, so I really could have it done. It looks like I have better vision than who actually did this :)

Anonymous said...

Suggest NWCS Principale to send a request to Microsoft IT to locate the individual and to sue the son of a bitch, or the bitch, shirt off.

Anonymous said...

L Chen said....

鉴于今日有家长来信询问给LWTC和州政府教育部门的信(以下简称
“该信”)是否本人所写,我在此声明如下:

1. 该信非本人所写或所发。本人对此毫不知情。

2. 本人不曾直接或间接地明示或暗示任何人写该信或类似给LWTC
和/或州政府教育部门的信。

3. 本人对发出该信或类似给LWTC或州政府教育部门的信均不持赞
赏或鼓励的态度。

4. 本人认为周琳女士在LWTC的本职工作与其在西北中文学校的工
作没有任何必然的联系。

谢谢大家。祝中文学校兴旺发达。

Anonymous said...

Too bad that we still don't know who L Chen is.

It will be fun to see how Zhoulin sue that person. What is she going to say? It is all facts.

Anonymous said...

It would be more funny for ZL to send a anonymous letter to L Chen's supervisor for harassment

Anonymous said...

I am sure ZL sent her share of anonymous letters. Who knows where all those letters went to.

Anonymous said...

Abosolutely, ZL send her fair share of annoymous mails.

Remember the notorious first annoymous email in NWCS history on May 7th to all members was send by ZL.

She got her share in the first place.